Consider a robot wandering around an unfamiliar environment. The robot's task is to con(cid:173) struct an internal model of its environment. The heart of this algorithm is a clever representation of the environment called an update graph. We have developed a connectionist implementation of the update graph using a highly-specialized network architecture. The network has the additional strength that it can accommodate stochastic environments.

The aim of my Ph.D. thesis concerns Reasoning in Highly Reactive Environments. As reasoning in highly reactive environments, we identify the setting in which a knowledge-based agent, with given goals, is deployed in an environment subject to repeated, sudden and possibly unknown changes. This is for instance the typical setting in which, e.g., artificial agents for video-games (the so called "bots"), cleaning robots, bomb clearing robots, and so on are deployed. In all these settings one can follow the classical approach in which the operations of the agent are distinguished in "sensing" the environment with proper interface devices, "thinking", and then behaving accordingly using proper actuators. In order to operate in an highly reactive environment, an artificial agent needs to be: 1. Responsive -> The agent must be able to react repeatedly and in a reasonable amount of time; 2. Elastic -> The agent must stay reactive also under varying workload; 3. Resilient -> The agent must stay responsive also in case of internal failure or failure of one of the programmed actions in the environment. Nowadays, thanks to new technologies in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it is already technically possible to create AI agents that are able to operate in reactive environments. Nevertheless, several issues stay unsolved, and are subject of ongoing research.

A reactive environment is one that responds to the actions of an agent rather than evolving obliviously. In reactive environments, experts algorithms must balance exploration and exploitation of experts more carefully than in oblivious ones. In addition, a more subtle definition of a learnable value of an expert is required. A general exploration-exploitation experts method is presented along with a proper definition of value. The method is shown to asymptotically perform as well as the best available expert. Several variants are analyzed from the viewpoint of the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, including explore-then-exploit, polynomially vanishing exploration, constant-frequency exploration, and constant-size exploration phases.Complexity and performance bounds are proven.

A reactive environment is one that responds to the actions of an agent rather than evolving obliviously. In reactive environments, experts algorithms must balance exploration and exploitation of experts more carefully than in oblivious ones. In addition, a more subtle definition of a learnable value of an expert is required. A general exploration-exploitation experts method is presented along with a proper definition of value. The method is shown to asymptotically perform as well as the best available expert. Several variants are analyzed from the viewpoint of the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, including explore-then-exploit, polynomially vanishing exploration, constant-frequency exploration, and constant-size exploration phases. Complexity and performance bounds are proven.

A reactive environment is one that responds to the actions of an agent rather than evolving obliviously. In reactive environments, experts algorithms must balance exploration and exploitation of experts more carefully than in oblivious ones. In addition, a more subtle definition of a learnable value of an expert is required. A general exploration-exploitation experts method is presented along with a proper definition of value. The method is shown to asymptotically perform as well as the best available expert. Several variants are analyzed from the viewpoint of the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, including explore-then-exploit, polynomially vanishing exploration, constant-frequency exploration, and constant-size exploration phases. Complexity and performance bounds are proven.

Consider a robot wandering around an unfamiliar environment.

Consider a robot wandering around an unfamiliar environment.

Consider a robot wandering around an unfamiliar environment.